Optimizing Guidance and Stochasticity Schedules
1Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering 路 2INMC 路 3IPAI & AIIS, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
*Equal contribution 路 Correspondence: sychun@snu.ac.kr
Key Idea
Generative posterior sampling for inverse problems usually consists of three main components: data consistency (DC) guidance, classifier-free guidance (CFG), and stochasticity. While prior works have focused on how to develop each or all of these components, far less attention has been paid to how to schedule them, leading to heuristically fixed or only partially adjusted, suboptimal schedules. We reveal that these three components follow triadic coupling dynamics, and propose TriPS (Triadic Dynamics Aware Diffusion Posterior Sampling), which optimizes the time-varying schedules of these three coupled forces.
Qualitative Samples
Drag the handle on any pair to reveal each side. Inpainting uses TriPS-T; the others use TriPS-G.
Analysis
We analyze the triadic coupling dynamics in posterior sampling, governed by DC guidance, CFG, and stochasticity. We formalize the early-stage DC-CFG conflict and show how stochasticity regularizes sampling trajectories toward higher-probability regions.


Method
To realize the triadic scheduling trend, TriPS comprises two complementary paradigms: a template-based schedule search that identifies robust schedule curves from a discrete family of functional forms, and a GRPO-based schedule optimization that captures complex temporal curves beyond the fixed functional templates.

Quantitative Comparison
Ablation

Cite
@misc{bang2026triadicdynamicsawarediffusion,
title = {Triadic Dynamics Aware Diffusion Posterior Sampling for Inverse
Problems: Optimizing Guidance and Stochasticity Schedules},
author = {Junseo Bang and Dong Ju Mun and Hoigi Seo and Seongmin Hong and Se Young Chun},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2605.26470},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CV},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26470}
}